There can be sadness as unhelpful stuff and limiting beliefs are released. All I can do is hold up a mirror and give them the opportunities to notice for themselves, in the kindest way I can. Is that important? Perhaps on a first game, yes, but on subsequent games I have to leave them to learn their own lessons in their own time and make the decisions to change their behaviour in their own sweet time. I notice how they are breathing, what they say and what clues I can glean from that and how they are with other players? Competitive? Collaborative? Who needs to “win”? I also have to notice my needs for them, to get out of the rat race and so on. I want to hold my clients in the best and most supportive state to support their learning. It is a melting pot where we try to spin out the good from the less helpful.
![cashflow 101 拍賣 cashflow 101 拍賣](https://img.itw01.com/images/2019/04/03/15/3119_Of97ns_UV78UE5.jpg)
cautious, rash, thinking, feeling and so on, does that get great results for them in the game as well as in their real lives. Is their game mirroring what I know of their real lives? Would they like to take this “pretend” opportunity to play the game of life and money another way, just for today, against type? Or does the way they are e.g. How is that impacting their game and the opportunities which come their way, or not? Then I ask them to notice what they are thinking and feeling but not saying. There’s quite a lot of logistics to manage. So I am functioning on lots of different levels – watching, listening, feeling, sensing and calculating and making sure everyone gets what they need and catches their coach or train home on time too and is reasonably fed (BYO) and watered during the day. The best observations are those I notice subliminally, with my senses, where I get a sense of their energy dropping or rising. How are they playing? What’s “happening” to them? Do they think what they want before they throw the dice? Is that the right strategy for them, based on what I know of them? Who’s feeling left out socially? Who’s struggling on the game board and why? Who’s not getting any opportunities? We teach what we most need to learn.Īnd then as the game speeds up and people start to enjoy themselves, setting aside their fears of something new and their performance anxiety, I can start to focus on their game. This lightens my load but also enhances their learning. As soon as I can see that some of the faster mathematicians have grasped that, I encourage them to teach others sitting closer to them than I am.
Cashflow 101 拍賣 how to#
Is that a good thing or just an ingrained habit, and a scarce one at that, keep us stuck in the rat race?Īnd I am showing them how to do their maths on their income statement, again without allowing the game to slow down too much. This time, as it happens, no-one forget to collect their pay cheque. I give them two strikes before the rules kick in. So I am trying to set a place which is somewhere in the middle so the slower processors can keep up and the faster thinkers don’t disengage.Īnd I am noticing when it’s their turn to get a pay cheque so they don’t forget. It’s a long game and unless we keep it moving some players get bored. So while I am doling out the newbies’ pay cheques, which change all the time so I have to get them to shout out the amount every go, I am teaching and encouraging the next player to take their turn. And I care enough about the players getting a great learning experience that I choose not to take a hand. You cannot play the game as well as teach and be the banker, there is just too much going on. I think I am pretty gifted at it, sorry to be so immodest, but I think you know when you are been doing something for a very long time whether or not you are any good at that. Doing the tidying up after Friday’s Cashflow 101 game in The Abundance Shed, packing away the money and rats and cheeses, pondering players’ dreams and their different learning styles, I find myself wondering about my facilitation style.